By Ali Al Yousifi
What’s the difference between a house and a palace?
Some might say that a palace is a big and
luxurious house. I’d disagree. I think a house and a palace are two completely
different things, almost like comparing a museum to a hospital. When it comes
to houses and palaces, largeness and extravagance are not the only points of
divergence. What’s critical here is that these two building types have entirely
different functions and purposes.
A house is a place where people live.
The house building is supposed to make the lives of its inhabitants most
comfortable; it helps them in their daily activities. A house serves those who
dwell in it; it cares about those inside its walls, not those outside. The
inhabitants of a house feel free to adjust the house in any way to make their
lives easier; they care about how the house works, not how it looks. A house can
be a home.
A palace is also a place where people
live, but the palace building is not concerned about making the lives of its
inhabitants comfortable. The purpose of a palace is to impress visitors; its
attention is turned towards those outside its walls not inside them. A palace
must be kept in perfect shape at all times; it doesn’t matter whether the lives
of its inhabitants are comfortable or easy, as long as it looks impressive, as
long as it inspires respect. A palace can never be a home.
Places of worship are often referred
to as ‘houses of God’, but I think most of them are palaces, not houses. I
think many of these buildings care more about impressing visitors than serving
users. These palaces, filled with sparkling crystals, polished marble, and carved
columns, are not where anyone can feel comfortable, and worship is the last
thing these buildings have been designed to accommodate.
An obvious example of this ‘palace of
God’ phenomenon is Sheikh Zayed’s Mosque in Abu Dhabi. Don’t misunderstand me,
while walking around its spaces, I found this building extremely beautiful,
truly impressive. But the next time I feel like contemplating the deeper things
in life, this ‘mosque’ will be the last place I’ll think of. You can call it a
museum, you can call it a sculpture, you can even call it a very expensive
pavilion, but don’t call it a house of God; the closest this building will ever come
to domesticity is for it to be a palace of God.
شاهدت منذ سنوات صورة لمبنى ذو لفراغ مبنى، سقفه محمول على عواميد كبيرة الحجم، وكأنها جُعِلَتْ للعماليق من أبناء عاد! وكان في الصورة نقطة صغيرة جداً إتضح لي فيما بعد أنها لآدمي من هذا العهد يقف فاغراً فاه من هول الـ"عظمة" التي تحيط به.
ReplyDeleteأرى أن دور العبادة يجب أن تحاكي هذه العظمة حيث يحضر العبد في حضرة الخالق لا ليشعر بفخامة المكان! بل عظمته، لأن العبد أمام حضرة الخالق ليس إلا مائن صغير.
أما الفخامة فهي في مثل هذه الفراغات خيار في غير محلع، فالعبد في دار العبادة جاء ليتعبّد وليكون تركيزه في صلاته وترتيلاته، لا في الوان وصور وعلامات تشد انتباهه عن الوظيفة التي خُلِقَت من أجبها تبك الفراغات